core courses and electives: customizing your academic program at aelo swiss academy

Every April, the course planning meetings begin, and every April I sit across from a parent holding a spreadsheet. Last year it was a father with two columns labeled "economics" and "studio art", asking which one would look better to universities in four years. It was a reasonable question, and I gave him an unsatisfying answer: neither, on its own, matters as much as he thought. What matters is how the whole program fits together across three or four years, and that is a different kind of decision entirely.

At AELO Swiss Academy, the timetable is deliberately built in two layers. There is a defined core that every student carries, and there is a wide elective band that each student shapes. The proportions between those layers shift as students mature, and the craft of a good academic program lies in how the two layers are fitted to one individual. This is what I want to walk through here: how the core is structured and why, how the elective system actually runs week to week, how a program gets built with an advisor, and the trade-offs we talk about honestly before anyone signs anything.

why a core still matters

The case for a core rests on one observation that teachers learn the hard way: some competencies are cumulative, and you cannot pause them for two years and pick them up cleanly at eighteen. Language learning compounds. Mathematics sequences, so dropping it at fourteen closes doors at seventeen that are difficult to reopen. Writing develops through volume and feedback over years, not through a single inspirational course. Elective freedom is genuinely valuable, but freedom without a floor produces students who discover, during a university application cycle, that a gap opened back in year one.

A shared core also does something less measurable. When every student in a cohort has read the same history and wrestled with the same scientific problems, classroom discussion has common ground. The cohort develops a shared intellectual vocabulary. I have watched seminars in schools without any common curriculum stall repeatedly, not because the students were weaker, but because half the room lacked the background the other half assumed.

The third point is the one families most often miss: a core is not a ceiling. Within our core courses, students are placed by readiness, supported where they arrive behind, and extended where they arrive ahead. The core is a floor with doors in it, not a uniform corridor.

the core at AELO Swiss Academy: what every student carries

Languages carry the largest share of the core, partly because we teach in English and partly because we sit in a country with three national languages and a fourth often in the room. Every student studies English as the language of instruction, with explicit academic writing work woven in rather than treated as a separate subject. French and German run alongside, and students choose which to prioritize in the middle years. Families arriving from abroad with little French or German are placed in an intensive support stream for a semester or two; that stream temporarily replaces one elective slot, and we are upfront that this is the trade.

Mathematics is set by readiness rather than age, in three pace bands. Placement is reviewed each term, and movement between bands is ordinary rather than exceptional. A student who accelerates in the second year is not treated as an anomaly; she is simply in the room where her work belongs. The reverse happens too, and the earlier it happens, the less it costs.

In the foundation years, science is taught as an integrated discipline, one teacher pulling biology, chemistry, and physics into a single coherent story. From the middle years onward the sciences separate, each with its own laboratory hours, because the habits of evidence in a wet lab differ from those in a field study or a data set. Humanities rotate through history, geography, and civics, with the Swiss political system taught explicitly since our students live inside it and will eventually vote somewhere. Physical education and at least one arts discipline remain part of the core through the foundation years.

One more component deserves mention because it is easy to overlook: advisory. Every student belongs to an advisory group of roughly ten, meeting weekly as a group and individually with their advisor every other week. Advisory is where study habits, workload management, wellbeing, and early university thinking are handled. It is part of the core in every sense that matters.

how the balance shifts over time

The core is large at the start and deliberately narrows. The figures below are approximate design targets rather than rigid quotas, and the remainder of the timetable in each stage goes to physical education, ensembles, and advisory.

| --- | --- | --- | --- |

The shape is the point. Freedom grows as judgment grows. A thirteen-year-old with a blank timetable tends to fill it either with everything or with what her friends chose; a seventeen-year-old with the same blank space usually knows exactly why she wants it.

electives: breadth first, then depth

When we sit down with students to plan, the advice we repeat most often is a simple rule of thumb: carry one breadth elective and one depth elective each year. The breadth elective opens a door the student has never walked through. The depth elective deepens something already working. A program built only from depth electives narrows too early; a program built only from breadth electives becomes a tour with no destination.

The elective catalog is organized into five clusters, and the specific courses inside each cluster rotate as demand and staffing shift:

Languages and communication: Spanish, Italian, Mandarin, rhetoric and debate, journalism
Sciences and computing: data literacy, robotics, advanced laboratory methods, astronomy
Arts: studio practice, ensemble music, theatre, film production
Society and enterprise: economics, psychology, entrepreneurship, Model United Nations
Mountain and making: alpine skills, design and technology, sustainability projects

Some electives are taught by our own faculty across departments, and others bring in practitioners from outside: a working architect has led the design module, and a conductor from the region has run the ensemble. Class sizes in electives stay in the low teens on purpose, and some courses deliberately mix year groups, which changes the dynamic in ways students consistently value once they experience it.

how elective blocks actually run

Electives come in two formats, and the difference matters more than families expect. Semester modules run for roughly a term, meet two or three periods a week, and are designed as low-stakes explorations. You can try film production for a semester, discover you love the editing suite, and move on without having bet a year on it. Year-long electives are the opposite bet: they meet more often, build skills sequentially, and lead somewhere, usually an advanced course or a capstone project in the senior pathway.

The tiers connect. A student might take the data literacy module in year two, choose the statistics and modelling elective in year three, and arrive in the advanced quantitative seminar in the senior pathway with a real foundation under her. We publish the prerequisite chains for every cluster so that a spring decision in year two can be made with year four already visible.

Logistics spin recovery training are simple but strict. There is a two-week swap window at the start of each semester during which students can change electives without penalty, and we encourage them to use it rather than silently endure a poor fit. After the window closes, a change requires advisor sign-off and a reason, because mid-year changes ripple into staffing and assessment planning. Most years, very few changes happen after October, which tells us the window is doing its job.

the planning conversation: how a program gets built

The cycle starts in April. Subject teachers flag students who should move levels or bands. Advisors then draft a course map for the following year with each student individually, usually in a forty-minute meeting where the student does most of the talking. Parents see the draft before the summer, and the program is finalized in the autumn swap window. The sequence matters: teachers first, student second, parents third. Programs reverse-engineered entirely by parents tend to produce compliance rather than commitment.

Take a student I will call Mara, since names should stay private. She arrived in the foundation years announcing, with the confidence of someone repeating an adult's verdict, that she was not a math person. Nobody argued with her directly. She took the data literacy module in year